The speaker taps into your sense of sight, touch, smell, and sound. At the end of the poem, the author leaves the conclusion open for interpretations of what happened to the final woodchuck because it is never directly stated whether or not he survived.
No longer is she under the Darwinian belief, but rather, she feels remorse for having killed the woodchuck family. The speaker is always ready for the moment when the final woodchuck will die. This leaves us with the intersection of man, technology and nature and what to do when that happens.
Both writers use imagery in their poems. The tone is very irritating and hateful toward the woodchucks. You can picture the image of him driving on a road and hitting a deer. All throughout the poem you can see a chase between the human and nature.
In this poem, their relationship, the man and the deer, shows the superiority of man over animal. In comparison to William Stafford, Maxine uses opposite language and tone. They must use nature and nothing more to defend themselves.
Darwinism is the assumption that conflict between groups in society leads to social progress as superior groups outcompete inferior ones.
The experience described is concrete. This is seen through the fact that the speaker is the one who must decide the fate of the unborn fawn. The author provides more imagery to describe the manner in which the mother woodchuck died.
This can make you connect with the story a little more. The speaker can make you feel the. The author states that the speaker, at one point, was not a violent person.
After this line the poem changes. Man and animals have different qualities and abilities. Man has technology to use to defend them against pretty much anything whereas an animal can only do so much.
He ended up pushing her off the edge into the river. O one-two-three the murderer inside me rose up hard. So this makes his decision clearer.
This is a sad ending, you can see the deer tumbling down, and picture the speaker getting emotional from it. The speaker has a genuinely sincere relationship with this deer.
A car, made by man, kills a deer, and it ultimately is man who has to suffer with the consequences of killing. The speaker feels deeply bad for the deer, who is an innocent bystander of human technology and our carelessness towards nature.
He is trying to justify himself by comparing the deer to a women, by mentioning that the deer was pregnant with an unborn fawn.
The poet begins to use imagery to depict the moral dilemma that the speaker was face to face with in the poem.Compare and Contrast Essay In the poems “Traveling Through the Dark” and “Woodchucks” man must make a decision about nature in the most inconvenient ultimedescente.com “Traveling Through the Dark” the narrator is faced with, literally, a life or death situation, whereas in “Woodchucks” the narrator is faced under the Darwinian belief about killing.
“Traveling through the Dark” by William E. Stanford and “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kumin a man must make the choice of nature and its. More Essay Examples on Compare Rubric. The poem “Traveling Through the Dark” deals with man vs. nature. The experience described is concrete. He describes a deer, lifeless on the ground and his dilemma on whether or not he should push it off the road, sparing other people’s lives, or keep it on the road.
More Essay Examples on Compare Rubric. This is noted through the narration of the poem and the images that the poet creates. The poet objectively reports that the man was just “traveling through the dark” and happened to find a deer.
We will write a custom essay sample on Compare & Contrast Woodchucks and Traveling Through the Dark specifically for you.
for only $ $/page. Order now. Search. Related Essays. Compare and contrast essay “traveling through the dark” and “woodchuck” Traveling Through the Dark Compare & Contrast Woodchucks and. In both poems “Traveling Through the Dark” by William Stafford, and “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kumin are comparing humans to different things.
“Traveling Through the Dark” compares the doe, car, and man and how they each conflict with each other. In “Woodchucks” it is comparing the conflicts between man and man with the allusion of .Download