Concurrent engineering vs traditional sequential methods

If such issues are not addressed properly, concurrent design may not work effectively. Concurrent Engineering Product Life Cycle Costs A comparison of the concurrent engineering model and the traditional model of product realization is shown in Figure 5.

Very often, the design team in the traditional model, do not have the knowledge and the skills to make a product that will be functional, of high quality and manufacturable. This means that info found out later in the process can be added to earlier parts, improving them, and also saving a lot of time.

In concurrent engineering, different tasks are tackled at the same time, and not necessarily in the usual order. After the design team completes its task, the production processes are designed based on the design of the product.

In the case that something does go wrong, the design usually must be scrapped or heavily altered. Only if the estimated cost is lower or equal to the targeted cost, the production of the product can begin.

At any rate the traditional model is vulnerable to a costly and error prone product realization. The concurrent engineering is a non-linear product or project design approach during which all phases of manufacturing operate at the same time - simultaneously.

Both product and process design run in parallel and occur in the same time frame. A frequently asked question is, how good the design can be without involvment of domain experts? Such design discipline is essential to ensure that the price of the product is competitive in the market.

Traditional "Waterfall" or Sequential Development Method vs. For example, if the manufacturing department has a part, that is difficult to manufacture due to the poor design, considerable time will be expended in order to manufacture the part. Decision making involves full team participation and involvement.

Cross-functional teams[ edit ] Cross-functional teams include people from different area of the workplace that are all involved in a particular process, including manufacturing, hardware and software design, marketing, and so forth. The basic premise for concurrent engineering revolves around two concepts.

A study claimed that a correct implementation of the concurrent design process can save a significant amount of money, and that organizations have been moving to concurrent design for this reason. What is the difference between concurrent engineering and sequnetial engineering Sequential engineering is the term used to describe the method of production in a linear format.A comparison of the concurrent engineering model and the traditional model of product realization is shown in Figure ultimedescente.com it can be seen, there are huge time savings when concurrent engineering is implemented in the design-to-manufacturing cycle of.

Traditional engineering

APPLICATION OF CONCURRENT ENGINEERING METHODS TO THE DESIGN OF AN AUTONOMOUS AERIAL ROBOT A THESIS Presented to The Academic Faculty LAcce An Example of the Sequential Design Process 14 The Paradox of Sequential Design' 14 Impact of Concurrent Engineering Application Traditional Engineering Concurrent Engineering everyone works together.

Where as Traditional Engineering each section of the design process is giving to one person and once they complete there section only then can the next person begin working.

Application Notes. General Knowledge. Subject: What is the difference between concurrent engineering and sequnetial engineering. Sequential engineering is the term used to describe the method of production in a linear format.

No document with DOI

In order to signify the differences between the traditional approach of sequential engineering and the modern concurrent engineering approach. Sequential versus Concurrent Engineering—An Analogy.

Concurrent engineering

Article (PDF Available) in Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications 3(4).

Download
Concurrent engineering vs traditional sequential methods
Rated 3/5 based on 67 review