Juveniles commit heinous crimes just like adults do and therefore no one should be exempt from equal punishment. So my question then is this: Police and officials in those cities applaud the fact that serious juvenile offenders from the early s were given adult sentences due to a crackdown at the time.
It may actually harm the mild offenders to have contact with youths who have committed violent crimes. When a teenager commits a violent crime, the community should not only consider the damage the crime did, but also look deeper into the cause of it. No more and no less. Some teens may be held there as runaways or shoplifters.
Is it fair for one person, just seventeen years of age, to be tried in a juvenile court, receiving a lesser sentence for under than someone who is just 5 months older who committed the same crime?
Sometimes children can change, just like my brother. My freshman year of school was the most memorable of my life, but not because of education or meeting new friends.
Maybe the parents should have taken a closer look at their kids. That is not to say that violent crime among youths is uncommon. Sometimes this gets taken to extremes that most would find preposterous: In conclusion, public opinion on the issue is fairly decisive.
If a friend or fellow gang member receives a hefty sentence, it should send a clear message to youths in the community. This can be the case even if the crime is murder Johnson. In general, however, it can be argued that violent crimes will decrease if a tougher penalty is assessed based on the juvenile being tried in adult court.
Some sources claim that trying juveniles as adults actually incorporates them into the criminal world at a young age and leads to a life of crime. Simply put, if the person is behind bars, there is little chance that he or she will have the opportunity to commit additional crimes.
If the concern is that juvenile courts are too lenient on violent offenders, then it would seem that juvenile courts need to change, but as this is probably a monumental task, prosecutors take the easy way out by - in effect - changing the definition of an adult.
He was involved in drive-by shootings. It could be argued that the age that defines adulthood is somewhat arbitrary and that some leeway should be given to prosecutors to determine whether or not a child has matured to the extent required to be considered an adult.
Alex Hribal, the year-old knife-wielding student who attacked classmates and a security guard at a Pennsylvania high school last week, has been charged as an adult with four counts of attempted murder and 21 counts of aggravated assault.
These crimes are nowhere near as violent and damaging to society.
That ought to put him away for a long time. A crime is a crime and for that reason Juveniles who commit violent crimes should be tried in the same way as adults.
All I knew was that he wanted to change and he did. Furthermore, potential juvenile offenders would be deterred from committing violent crimes which would lead to an overall decline in violent crimes perpetrated by juveniles.
I had to go through two metal detectors every morning. Does one or two years younger than 18 make much of a difference? He spent an afternoon in jail and received counseling.
But black is not white. The decline that occurred in most of the U.
Violent crimes can be defined as murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault, larceny-theft and the like depending on state law pbs. Frankly, juvenile court had years to get it right and they have not.
Who could ever forget watching the news and seeing a typical high school in Colorado held hostage by the Trench Coat Mafia? No one would want to hire that person because of his record and he would never get a chance to live to the best of his ability.Juveniles Should Be Tried as Adults Essay - "Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." -- David Grusin and Morgan Ames Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult.
Some say stop trying them as adults and try them as juveniles, others say they must be tried as adults when they commit adult crimes. I believe that teens should be held accountable for their. Essay about Juvenile Criminals Should Not Be Tried as Adults - Juvenile Criminals Should Not Be Tried as Adults Today?s court system is left with many difficult decisions.
One of the most controversial being whether to try juveniles as adults or not.
I agree with you in most cases, but I think that teens should be tried as adults, not pre-teens. The punishments should still be raised for severe crimes for pre-teens, but they are not as mature.
As more minors are committing violent crimes, the question of whether they should be tried as adults is on the rise. Children as young as 13 or 14 are committing violent. The idea behind the propensity to charge violent teens as adults is presumably to ensure that the perpetrator of the crime doesn’t get off easy, the way he might in a juvenile court.Download