It has been called arguably the most important discussion of the meaning of photography in the English language. An appreciation of the influence of culture on affective responses to pain and expectations for pain treatment is critical to culturally responsive management of people in pain.
There are also culturally-based attitudes about using pain medication. Sontag considers the many ways that war is articulated through images, noting that artifice did not end with the advent of photography.
War is articulated in many different ways through images. Except, it does happen again. Images make events seem "real" to viewers, even as they seem "unreal" in their similarity to art. More importantly, author sees an unseen aspect of war in relation to gender.
If there is one thing that the photographic archive of the 20th century proves time and again it is that people are all too able to commit the most god-awful atrocities, often with a kind of gleeful abandon.
Being Muslim, he offered his pain to Allah in thanks for the good fortune of being allowed the special surgery. Piranesi did scenes of Rome and also visions of Ancient Rome — reconstructions in the shape of maps as well as imaginative drawings.
Only through this self-awareness can we establish a basis for comparison that allows us to see where our attitudes and beliefs are likely to collide with those of patients who come from very different cultures. Anyone who is able to see war as inevitable or circumstantially just will never be able to see the antiwar movement in the photos at all.
Why should we look at these photographs of faraway horrors if we are not able to do anything about what the images show? But can we trust photographs taken during combat? Sontag reviews the wealth of photographs documenting military conflicts around the world since the midth century, highlighting the important changes in technology, style, and ideology.
Emotive patients are more likely to verbalize their expressions of pain, prefer to have people around and expect others to react to their pain so as to validate their discomfort.
War photography is usually anti-war in nature, and governments try to fight this sentiment. Viewers are more inclined to feel compassion toward subjects of their own race and nationality. Journalists participate in self-censorship based on idealistic concepts of good taste.
Governments clamp down on photojournalism to silence anti-war sentiment. Copyright Super Summary. Shots are often staged and re-enacted for the camera. Shots are often staged and events reenacted for the camera. People in some cultures attach great superstition to particular numbers, and smiling does not suggest feeling good in all cultures.
The role of the health care provider is to help patients advocate for what feels appropriate for them within their cultural context. Or, their use may be stigmatized — as being self-indulgent, addictive, etc. Sontag also cites self-censorship among Western journalists as a reason behind the double standards in depicting friendly and enemy casualties.
In the first major photographed wars, the Crimean War and the American Civil War, combat itself remained off-camera. Author reminds the contribution of women to the war as a positive element that is seen in gender perspective. Sontag begins by discussing Three Guineas, which looks at several sets of photographs of the Spanish Civil War.
Patients are often asked to rate their pain on a scale from 1- In general, people made as little fuss as possible over injuries and illness. Sontag debunks many of these ideas, including many pictures of pain, horror, and atrocities, admitting that some of the ideas she herself even contributed to.
Viewers are naturally inclined to feel sympathy for those of their own race and creed. The argument sits between two contradictory feelings about getting truth from photos. Moreover, is it ethical to disregard the gender imbalances?
His American nurse waited for him to request pain medication, but he never did. In some cultures, people believe that the more intrusive a procedure is, the better it is for them.
Expenditure on military and arms which leads to economic instability which eventually impacts on household economy, loss of husband, brother, parents, domestic violence related with arms and military experiences are recognized as negative impacts of war.In this investigation of the role of imagery in our culture, Susan Sontag cuts through circular arguments about how pictures can inspire dissent or foster violence as she takes a fresh look at the representation of atrocity--from Goya's The Disasters of War to photographs of the American Civil War, lynchings of blacks in the South, and Dachau /5(13).
'Regarding the Pain of Others' is an article describing a different point of view about war as that proposed by Virginia WoolfSample Essay on an Analytical Essay in Response to “Regarding the Pain of Others” By Sontag Susan If people are guided through a different culture that bans war and considers it inhuman; not necessary in life.
Mar 05, · Impacts of war run through all individuals as a form of violence, mentally, and physically. Hence, the gender perspective analyses the socio economic factors also as a form of violence and as possible warning signs.
Regarding the Pain of Others Amazon. Twenty-five years after her classic On Photography, Susan Sontag returned here to the subject of visual representations of war and violence in our culture.
Regarding The Pain Of Others Susan Sontag. Susan Sontag. “Wise and somberSontag's closing words acknowledge that there are realities which no picture can convey.” —Los Angeles Times Book Review “The history of sensibility in a culture shaped by the mechanical reproduction of ultimedescente.com always been one of the guiding preoccupations of her best work, from Against Interpretation to The Volcano ultimedescente.coming the Pain of Others.Download